“Hey I want that helmet!” “No, me want the helmet!” “No, me!”
“Me!” I hear these words as I stand on the playground on a brisk winter
morning. Turning towards the commotion,
I see that two children are both vying for a blue bicycle helmet, the
only blue bicycle helmet that happens to be on the playground
today. I start moving towards them,
careful not to rush in too soon, but also aware of how quickly the situation
might escalate.
I kneel
down beside them. I say, “It sounds like
you both want the same blue helmet, but there’s only one blue helmet. What ideas do you have to solve this
problem?” They pause for a moment to
think. “He could use the black
helmet,” One child says, as he points to the one hanging nearby. “No! I want the blue helmet,” the other child responds. I say, “So, your idea was that he could use the black helmet, but he said no, he still wants the blue
helmet." To the second child, I asked: "Do you have any
ideas?” He says, “We could take
turns!” I say, “His idea is that you
could take turns. What do you think
about that?” “No, me don’t want to take turns,” the first child responds. Then something curious happens. The first child pauses once again and then says, “He can use the blue helmet, and me make dinner.
Then me use the blue helmet.” I reflect his words to the other child, “Oh, he says you could use the blue helmet while he makes
dinner, and then he could use the blue helmet.
What do you think about that idea?”
“Yeah!”, the second child responds, and they rush off to begin their newly negotiated ideas.
This
is my second day as one of the teachers of the Preschool House after visiting
and observing the children three days previously. On all five of these days, this has been a
common occurrence: these two children having a conflict over the same
object or toy. But as common as this
occurrence is, what is even more common is these two playing together! Every day during outside time these two find one another in the yard and quickly commence their time together. In fact, the situation
described above is the direct result of their attempt to ride bikes with one
another.
As humans, as well as animals, conflict is a phenomenon
that occurs all around us. It occurs as
a result of desire, of love, of hardship, of need, and a host of other
reasons. In spite of the rate
of this occurrence, we find a myriad of ways to avoid it. These ways are sometimes subtle, sometimes
overt, but present nonetheless. This is understandable as we have witnessed some of the damaging results of
conflict; one only has to tune in to the national news these days to glimpse
this reality, which makes the ability to navigate conflict all the more urgent and necessary.
When
I was in Reggio Emilia, Italy (home of the Reggio Emilia Approach) a pedagogista
there, Annalisa Rabotti, was asked by another educator from the United States
how to avoid conflict between children.
Annalisa responded that conflict is certainly not something to be
avoided, but rather, “conflict is the pretext for learning how to be
together.” I thought her words were
poignant and spoke to the heart of the opportunity created by conflict. Whenever I see these two children entering into the
space of conflct, what I see is opportunity - opportunity for growth,
opportunity for connection, opportunity for relationship.
In
the midst of this conflict, the two friends learn something about one
another. They move closer in, they
encounter one another anew, and depart having existed in the presence of one
another’s vulnerability, and thus, have moved deeper into relationship. This is a monumental gesture, one that has
the opportunity to change not only them and their bond together, but also the
fabric of the society of which they are a part.
The psychoanalyst Scott Peck says in his book, A Different Drum,
“There is no community without vulnerability, and there is no vulnerability
without risk.” This young friendship is instructive in this way and offers
us further insight into the relational opportunity posed by conflict.
Comments
Post a Comment